| Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour

Call for Contributions: New Policy Ultra Briefs (PUBs) series on early warnings

At the initiative of the German Psychological Society (DGPs), a new series of Policy Ultra Briefs (PUBs) on early warning systems for extreme weather events and climate-related risks is being launched. The series is co-edited by scholars from the Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour (IPB), who invite submissions of contribution ideas grounded in behavioural science. Submission deadline: 01.03.2026.

An initiative of the German Society for Psychology (DGPs)

As extreme weather events become more frequent and severe — including heatwaves, heavy rainfall and flash floods, prolonged droughts, low-water periods, and severe storms — the demand for scientifically robust and readily accessible evidence to inform political decision-making is increasing. 

Early warning systems play a key role in this context: they are designed to identify risks at an early stage and communicate them in a comprehensible manner, initiate effective protective measures, and support decision-making processes in crises. Their effectiveness depends not only on predictive accuracy but also on system design, communication strategies, and how warnings are perceived, interpreted, and acted upon by diverse population groups.

Behavioural sciences provide key evidence in this regard: they examine where and how people perceive and interpret warnings, which factors influence the implementation of (explicitly) recommended protective measures and behaviour in general, which communication strategies are effective, and how systems can be designed to reliably reach different population groups. The purpose of this PUB series is to synthesise these findings in a concise, policy-oriented format that enables decision-makers to access reliable behavioural science evidence quickly and efficiently. 

For the upcoming call, we are therefore looking for contribution ideas that concisely summarise current evidence on early warning systems for heat, floods, and other climate- and crisis-related risks and derive implications for political decisions.

Aim of the Policy Ultra Briefs

The Policy Ultra Briefs summarise scientific findings from psychology and related behavioural sciences in a maximum of two pages. They are designed to provide policy-makers with clear, accessible, and evidence-based insights relevant to decision-making processes. There is a particular need for clear, easily understandable, and technically sound overviews in the areas of risk communication, disaster preparedness, and early warning systems. Scientific findings should therefore be made usable in practice in order to improve the effectiveness of communication, prevention and resilience strategies in the context of growing climate risks. 

First series of Policy Ultra-Briefs

A first series on the topic of climate protection has already been published: https://psychologie.de/oeffentlichkeit/policy-ultra-briefs/klimaschutz/

Click here

Invitation to submit contribution ideas

We invite authors from the fields of psychology, behavioural economics, sociology, communication studies, behavioural political science, and related disciplines to submit ideas for contributions as a first step. We particularly welcome proposals that address behavioural science evidence on the following questions:

  • How are warnings about heat, floods and other extreme events perceived?
  • How should short warning messages be designed to trigger protective behaviour?
  • What factors promote or inhibit protective behaviour in a warning situation?
  • How should early warning systems be designed to reach different target groups?
  • Which communication strategies work in acute crisis situations?
  • What role can artificial intelligence play in early warning systems? 

Your contribution idea should briefly outline the following points:

  • Topic and central question
  • Relevance for political decision-making processes
  • Briefly outlined behavioural science evidence or starting points
  • authors involved, if applicable

These brief outlines serve to coordinate content, avoid overlaps and ensure thematic consistency.

Please submit your proposals for contributions to this call by March 1, 2026 via the submission portal ww3.unipark.de/uc/SOWpsych/c8bb/.

Current provisional timeline
  • March 1, 2026 Deadline for submission
  • March 6, 2026 Decision on contributions
  • May 1, 2026 Deadline for two-page contributions (contributions received earlier will be processed on an ongoing basis)
  • July 31, 2026 Review and revision process
  • September 1, 2026 Finalisation and publication

The editorial team selects suitable proposals and invites the authors to draft a complete Policy Ultra Brief; if necessary, PUBs with similar topics are combined in consultation with the authors.

Formal requirements for completed contributions

  • Maximum two pages of text (plus cover page)
  • Concise, clearly structured presentation
  • Scientifically sound and reliable, including an assessment of the quality of evidence
  • High relevance for political decision-making processes in the field of early warnings & extreme weather events
  • Peer review organised by the editorial team

Review & publication

All submitted concept ideas are coordinated in advance with members of the editorial team. The finalised contributions then undergo an anonymous peer review process. Accepted PUBs are published as part of the series, distributed on https://psychologie.de/oeffentlichkeit/policy-ultra-briefs/ and via participating networks. Each contribution is assigned a DOI, making it easy to cite.

Editors
Prof. Dr. Cornelia Betsch
Prof. Dr. Markus Reichstein
Dr. Dominik Daube
Sarah Pelull

Contact person:

Director
(Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour (IPB))
C19 – research building "Weltbeziehungen" / C19.01.27